NIH Public Access
Author Manuscript
J Org Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 17.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Published in final edited form as:
J Org Chem. 2004 April 2; 69(7): 2569–2572.
Unified Synthesis of C19–C26 Subunits of Amphidinolides B1, B2,
and B3 by Exploiting Unexpected Stereochemical Differences in
Crimmins’ and Evans’ Aldol Reactions
Wei Zhang, Rich G. Carter*, and Alexandre F. T. Yokochi†
Department of Chemistry, 153 Gilbert Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331
Abstract
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
The efficient synthesis of the C19–C26 subunit of amphidinolide B1 and B2 has been completed using
a boron-mediated aldol reaction. The synthesis of the C19–C26 subunit of amphidinolide B3 has also
been accomplished through an unexpected anti aldol reaction using a titanium-mediated process. In
addition, the first reported examples of a stereochemical discrepancy between the Evans’ boronmediated oxazolidinone and the Crimmins’ titanium-mediated oxazolidinethione aldol reactions are
disclosed. A working hypothesis is put forth to explain the results.
The synthetic utility of chiral oxazolidinones has been well-documented in the organic
community.1 This powerful removable auxiliary has been shown to be effective in the
construction of a wide variety of carbon–carbon and carbon–heteroatom bonds in a highly
stereoselective fashion. Numerous working models have been put forth to explain and predict
the resultant stereochemical outcome from these reactions. These models have proven to be
highly reliable and general, with only isolated examples of anomalies having been reported.2
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
In particular, the so-called “Evans-syn” aldol reactions with chiral oxazolidinones using
dibutylboron triflate and the appropriate amine base have become the standard by which new
asymmetric and diastereoselective reactions are judged against (Scheme 1).3 The recently
developed titanium-mediated oxazolidinethione aldol reaction, from the Crimmins laboratory,
has been shown to provide comparable levels of selectivity on a wide range of systems.4 There
are several advantages to the Crimmins’ aldol methodology (e.g., relative ease of auxiliary
cleavage and use of the logistically easier titanium enolates). One particularly attractive
attribute is the flexibility imparted by Crimmins’ chelated and nonchelated models which is
dependent on the amount of TiCl4 and amine base (normally (−)-sparteine) that is added. This
modification provides access to both the Evans-syn product via the nonchelated model and the
non-Evans-syn adduct via the chelated model (Scheme 1). The level of syn/anti selectivity is
high (normally > 20:1) and comparable to traditional boron-mediated aldol reactions for both
the chelated and nonchelated titanium-mediated conditions. It should be pointed out that
Crimmins has shown that the chirality of (−)-sparteine does not influence the stereochemical
outcome of the transformation.4
We were attracted to the application of the Crimmins and/or Evans methodologies for the
construction the eastern subunit 15 of the cytotoxic macrolide amphidinolide B1 (11)5,6
rich.carter@oregonstate.edu.
†Director of X-ray Crystallographic Facility, Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331. E-mail:
alexandre.yokochi@oregonstate.edu.
Supporting Information Available: Crystallographic data for aldol adduct 28 and experimental procedures, including copies of spectral
data (1H and 13C NMR), for compounds 15, 16, 21, 23–25, 28, 29, 31–34, 36–38, 44–46, and 49. This material is available free of charge
via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Zhang et al.
Page 2
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
(Scheme 2). Amphidinolide B1 has attracted considerable synthetic interest,7 yet the total
synthesis of 11 remains an elusive target.8 Two additional members of the amphidinolide B
family, B2 (12) and B3 (13), have also been reported. These structures only differ from the
parent B1 structure by alternate stereochemistries at C18 and/or C22. Compounds 11 and 12
should be accessible from a common subunit 15 while C22 epimer 13 should be accessible
from the anti,anti adduct 16.
While the application of the titanium-mediated aldol methodology has begun to appear,9
several important combinations have yet to be fully explored. One such example is the coupling
of an O-benzyl-protected glycolate such as 2 or 8 with an α-chiral aldehyde 3 to provide a
syn,syn coupled adduct such as 7 or 10 (Scheme 1). The stereochemical “Felkin” relationship
of the C22 and C23 positions (amphidinolide B1 numbering) would appear to be ideally suited
for this transformation as both the auxiliary and the aldehyde appear to be directing the outcome
in a complementary fashion. Despite this combination, the examples of a syn,syn adduct from
an O-benzyl-protected glycolate such as 1, 2, or 8 are surprisingly rare.10 In fact, no examples
of the aldol reaction depicted with oxazolidinethione 2 or 8 have been reported with α-chiral
aldehydes. In this paper, we disclose the first reported examples of these combinations and the
resulting synthesis of the C19–C26 subunits 15 and 16 for all amphidinolides B1–B3.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Construction of the necessary aldehyde precursor 21 was accomplished in four steps from
commercially available Myers auxiliary 18. The known alkylation11 with the commercially
available (R)-propylene oxide provided the C23,24-coupled material 19 in 94:6 dr.12
Subsequent TES protection followed by reduction with BH3·NH3/LDA and Ley oxidation13
yielded the desired aldehyde 21 (Scheme 3).
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Exploration into the aldol reaction commenced with the known oxazolidinethione auxiliary
2214 (Scheme 4). Treatment of the prescribed conditions for obtaining nonchelation or “Evanssyn” aldol adducts [TiCl4 (1.0 equiv), (−)-sparteine (2.5 equiv)] provided two diastereomeric
aldol adducts 23 and 24 in a 1.5:1 ratio. Unlike as predicted in the Crimmins’ models for this
transformation, none of the expected Evans-syn adduct was observed. Instead, the anti adducts
23 (H21–H22 J = 9.3 Hz) and 24 (H21–H22 J = 8.4 Hz) were isolated in nearly equal amounts.
15 The addition of additives such as NMP or alternate bases (e.g., TMEDA) did not affect the
observed stereochemical outcome.4 Thwarted by this unexpected result, we turned to an achiral
aldehyde (2-butenal) to ensure the protocol was performing as expected. Aldol reaction under
the identical conditions [TiCl4 (1.0 equiv), (−)-sparteine (2.5 equiv)] provided solely the
expected Evans-syn adduct 25 (H21–H22 J = 3.3 Hz) in a 17:1 ratio. One possible explanation
would be a mismatched relationship between the directing effect of the auxiliary and the
inherent stereochemical preference of the aldehyde. To this end, the experiment was conducted
with the achiral auxiliary 26; however, equal amounts of the two previously observed anti
stereochemistries (21R,22R and 21S,22S) were again the only observable products.
Given that the nonchelation approach provided none of the desired syn adduct (e.g., compound
7), the complementary chelation aldol would appear to be the next logical step (Scheme 5).
Using the enantiomeric oxazolidinethione auxiliary 27, treatment under the chelation
conditions [TiCl4 (2 equiv), (−)-sparteine (1 equiv)] proceeded poorly and in low yield.
Crimmins has also reported that the use of less TiCl4 [(1 equiv), (−)-sparteine (1 equiv)]
proceeds via the chelated model.4 Treatment using these conditions provided some
improvement in the selectivity of the transformation, yielding a more respectable 4:1 ratio of
the two anti products (28/29) (28: H21–H22 J = 8.8 Hz; 29: H21–H22 J = 9.2 Hz) with none of
the predicted syn adduct. It is important to note that despite the expected directing effect of the
auxiliary (e.g., 22 should give the same absolute configuration at C21, C22 under nonchelation
conditions as enantiomeric auxiliary 27 gives under chelation conditions), the major product
28 from the chelation-controlled conditions using 27 contained the 21R,22R stereochemistry
J Org Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 17.
Zhang et al.
Page 3
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
of the minor product from the nonchelation conditions with 22. Alcohol 28 is synthetically
useful as it possesses the correct anti,anti C21–23 stereochemistry for amphidinolide B3.
Interestingly, use of the enantiomeric auxiliary 22 under chelation conditions led to an equal
mixture of the adducts 23 and 24. A similar result was observed with the achiral auxiliary 26.
It became apparent at this juncture that the titanium-based aldol were unable to provide the
necessary stereochemical relationship (e.g., 7 or 10) for amphidinolides B1 and B2. We were
gratified to observe that use of the auxiliary 3016 under boron-mediated conditions did yield
the desired Evans-syn adduct 31 (H21–H22 J = 2.1 Hz) in a 95:5 syn,syn and syn,anti ratio (72%
isolated yield of 31). To the best of our knowledge, these results represent the first reported
examples of the stereochemical divergence between the titanium-mediated oxazolidinethiones
and boron-mediated oxazolidinones.15
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Stereochemical assignment of the aldol products 23–25, 28–29, and 31 was accomplished via
a series of degradation experiments and X-ray crystallographic analysis of 28 (Scheme 6).
Reductive removal of the auxiliaries from adducts 24 and 28 yielded an identical diol 32,
thereby confirming 24 vis-à-vis X-ray structure 28. An analogous path was followed for the
adducts 23 and 29 to yield the diol 34. The stereochemistry of 31 was confirmed via conversion
to the TBDPS ether 36 and correlation with the TBDPS ether 33 through TPAP oxidation to
the ketone 37. This degradation also indirectly established one of the two unknown
stereocenters of 23 and 29 as 21S by assignment of both aldol adducts 28 and 31 as the 21R
configuration. The 22S configuration was confirmed by Mosher ester analysis of 35.17 Finally,
the stereochemistry of 25 was confirmed by reduction to a known compound 38.18
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
A working hypothesis for the observed stereochemical results invokes the use of the open
transition state 40 and boat transition states19 41 and 43 to explain the observed
stereochemistry (Scheme 7). One possible rational for the inability of these transformations to
proceed through the chair transition states 39 and 42 could be an unfavorable interaction
between the benzyloxy substituent and the α-position of the aldehyde.20 As steric bulk at these
positions increase, this unfavorable interaction should become more significant. We also
hypothesize that the bulk of the benzyloxy substituent may be increased by an aggregation
effect. While additional studies are necessary to verify this aggregation effect, we do observe
a modest correlation of concentration with diastereoselectivity [0.15 M, 4:1 dr; 0.05 M, 2:1 dr
(28:29)]. A similar correlation is observed for this transformation by even a slight variation in
the ratio of auxiliary to aldehyde. The use of 1.5 equiv of auxiliary 27 with 1 equiv of the
aldehyde 21 yielded a 4:1 ratio (28/29), while 2.0 equiv of the same auxiliary 27 (1 equiv of
21) yielded a 2:1 ratio (28/29) under the described chelation conditions. Phillips and co-workers
have also commented on the sensitivity of titanium-mediated aldol reactions to slight
modifications.19a In contrast to the titanium enolates, the boron enolates are unable to
aggregate in the Zimmerman–Traxler transition state due to the full valence shell on boron.
This important difference does appear to agree with the observed stereochemical results.
Finally, an open transition state 40 is put forth to justify the anti adduct 23.15 This proposed
explanation allows for an approach of the aldehyde consistent with the Felkin model.
Completion of the C19–C26 subunits of amphidinolide B1–B3 was accomplished in three steps
(Scheme 8). Silylation using TESOTf provided the bissilylated compound 44. Conversion to
the thioester using catalytic amounts of KSEt followed by cuprate coupling gave the methyl
ketone 15.21 An analogous path was pursued with anti,anti adduct 28 to provide the methyl
ketone 16. Interestingly, attempted introduction of TBS protecting group on the adduct 31 led
to competitive silyl migration. This migration was not observed with the adduct 28.
A unified strategy for the synthesis of the C19–C26 subunits of amphidinolide B1–B3 13–15
has been accomplished. The first reported examples of the divergence of the titanium-mediated
J Org Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 17.
Zhang et al.
Page 4
oxazolidinethione aldol reaction to provide the anti adducts 23–24 and 28–29 as the sole
products have been reported. A working model is put forth to explain the stereochemical results.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Supplemental Material
Refer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
Financial support was provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (GM63723) and Oregon State University.
This publication was also made possible in part by a grant from the NIH–National Institute of Environmental Health
Sciences (P30 ES00210). We thank Professor Max Dienzer (Mass Spectrometry Facility, Environmental Health
Sciences Center, Oregon State University) and Dr. Jeff Morré (Mass Spectrometry Facility, Environmental Health
Sciences Center, Oregon State University) for mass spectra data, Roger Kohnert (Oregon State University) for NMR
assistance, and Dr. Roger Hanselmann (Rib-X Pharmaceuticals) for his helpful discussions.
References
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
1. Evans, DA.; Kim, AS. Handbook of Reagents for Organic Synthesis: Reagents, Auxiliaries and
Catalysts for C–C Bonds. Coates, RM.; Denmark, SE., editors. John Wiley & Sons; New York: 1999.
p. 91-101.
2. (a) Clive DLJ, Yu M. Chem Commun 2002:2380–81. (b) Evans DA, Kaldor SW, Jones TK, Clardy J,
Stout TJ. J Am Chem Soc 1990;112:7001–31. (c) Iseki K, Oishi S, Kobayashi Y. Tetrahedron
1996;52:71–84.
3. (a) Evans DA, Bartroli J, Shih TL. J Am Chem Soc 1981;103:2127–29. (b) Evans DA, Nelson JV,
Taber TR. Top Stereochem 1982;13:1–115.
4. Crimmins MT, King BW, Tabet EA, Chaudhary K. J Org Chem 2001;66:894–902. [PubMed:
11430110]
5. Ishibashi M, Ishiyama H, Kobayashi J. Tetrahedron Lett 1994;35:8241–42.
6. (a) Kobayashi J, Ishibashi M, Nakamura H, Ohizumi Y, Hirata Y, Sasaki T, Ohta T, Nozoe S. J Nat
Prod 1989;52:1036–41. [PubMed: 2607346] (b) Ishibashi M, Ohizumi Y, Hamashima M, Nakamura
H, Hirata Y, Sasaki T, Kobayashi J. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 1987:1127–29.
7. (a) Cid B, Pattenden G. Tetrahedron Lett 2000;41:2573–76. (b) Ohi K, Nishiyama S. Synlett 1999:571–
72. (c) Ohi K, Nishiyama S. Synlett 1999:573–75. (d) Eng HM, Myles DC. Tetrahedron Lett
1999;40:2275–78. (e) Eng HM, Myles DC. Tetrahedron Lett 1999;40:2279–82. (f) Chakraborty TK,
Thippewamy D. Synlett 1999:150–52. (g) Ishiyama H, Takemura T, Tsuda M, Kobayashi J. J Chem
Soc Perkin Trans 1999;1:1163–66. (h) Chakraborty TK, Thippewamy D, Suresh VR, Jayaprakash S.
Chem Lett 1997:563–64. (i) Chakraborty TK, Suresh VR. Chem Lett 1997:565–66. (j) Lee DH, Lee
S-W. Tetrahedron Lett 1997;38:7909–10. (k) Ohi K, Shima K, Hamada K, Saito Y, Yamada N, Ohba
S, Nishiyama S. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 1998;71:2433–40.
8. For total syntheses of other members of the amphidinolides: (a) Williams DR, Kissel WS. J Am Chem
Soc 1998;120:11198–99. (b) Williams DR, Myers BJ, Mi L. Org Lett 2000;2:945–48. [PubMed:
10768193] (c) Williams DR, Meyer KG. J Am Chem Soc 2001;123:765–66. [PubMed: 11456603] (d)
Lam HW, Pattenden G. Angew Chem Int Ed 2002;41:508–511. (e) Maleczka RE, Terrell LR, Geng
F, Ward JS III. Org Lett 2002;4:2841–44. [PubMed: 12182569] (f) Trost BM, Chrisholm JD,
Wrobleski ST, Jung M. J Am Chem Soc 2002;124:12420–21. [PubMed: 12381177] (g) Fürstner A,
Aïssa C, Riveiros R, Ragot J. Angew Chem Int Ed 2002;41:4763–66. (h) Ghosh AK, Liu C. J Am
Chem Soc 2003;125:2374–75. [PubMed: 12603108]
9. (a) Crimmins MT, King BW, Zuercher WJ, Choy AL. J Org Chem 2000;65:8499–09. [PubMed:
11112569] (b) Crimmins MT, Choy AL. J Am Chem Soc 1999;121:5653–60. (c) Crimmins MT, Katz
JD, McAtee LC, Tabet EA, Kirincich SJ. Org Lett 2001;3:949–52. [PubMed: 11263923]
10. Only four reported examples of this combination have appeared in the literature: (a) Crimmins MT,
Katz JD, McAtee LC, Tabet EA, Kirincich SJ. Org Lett 2001;3:949–52. [PubMed: 11263923] (b)
Chakaborty TK, Suresh VR. Tetrahedron Lett 1998;39:7775–78. (c) Piscopio AD, Minowa N,
Chakraborty TK, Koide K, Bertinato P, Nicolaou KC. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 1993:617–18.
(d) Jones TK, Reamer RA, Desmond R, Mills SG. J Am Chem Soc 1990;112:2998–3017.
J Org Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 17.
Zhang et al.
Page 5
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
11. Myers AG, McKinstry L. J Org Chem 1996;61:2428–40.
12. It should be noted that this stereochemical combination provides the epimeric stereochemistry at
C25 versus the target 11; however, the alkylation of the enantiomeric (S)-propylene oxide proceeds
in poor selectivity due to its mismatched relationship to the approaching enolate. This stereocenter
will be inverted later in the synthetic sequence.
13. Ley SV, Norman J, Griffith WP, Marsden SP. Synthesis 1994:639–66.
14. Crimmins MT, McDougall PJ. Org Lett 2003;5:591–94. [PubMed: 12583777]
15. It should be noted that Crimmins has recently reported the development of a titanium-mediated
oxazolidinethione method for the synthesis of anti aldol adducts through an open transition state;
however, this reaction protocol requires the addition of an additional 2.5 equiv of TiCl4 immediately
prior to addition of the aldehyde. See ref 14.
16. Evans DA, Gage JR, Leighton JL, Kim AS. J Org Chem 1992;57:1961–3.
17. (a) Ohtani I, Kusumi T, Kashman Y, Kakisawa H. J Am Chem Soc 1991;113:4092–96. (b) Dale JA,
Mosher HS. J Am Chem Soc 1973;95:512–19. (c) Sullivan GR, Dale JA, Mosher HS. J Org Chem
1973;38:2143–47.
18. Reduction using lithium borohydride revealed the known diol which match the reported 1H NMR
and 13C NMR spectrum. [[α]20D = +17.5 (c = 0.48, CHCl3) vs lit. +16.8 (c = 2.0 in CHCl3)]. Fuhry
MAM, Holmes AB, Marshall DR. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1993;1:2743–46.
19. The preference for a boat transition state in oxazolidinethione aldol reactions has been proposed
previously. (a) Guz NR, Phillips AJ. Org Lett 2002;4:2253–56. [PubMed: 12074680] (b) Evans DA,
Downey CW, Shaw JT, Tedrow JS. Org Lett 2002;4:1127–30. [PubMed: 11922799]
20. For recent and somewhat related examples, see: (a) Evans DA, Siska SJ, Cee VJ. Angew Chem Int
Ed 2003;42:1761–65. (b) Marco JA, Carda M, Díaz-Oltra S, Murga J, Falomir E, Roeper H. J Org
Chem 2003;68:8577–82. [PubMed: 14575488]
21. White JD, Carter RG, Sundermann KF, Wartmann M. J Am Chem Soc 2001;123:5407–13. [PubMed:
11389619]
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
J Org Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 17.
Zhang et al.
Page 6
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Scheme 1.
Generalized Examples of Crimmins’ and Evans’ Aldol Adducts
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
J Org Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 17.
Zhang et al.
Page 7
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Scheme 2.
Retrosynthetic Analysis of Amphidinolide B1
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
J Org Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 17.
Zhang et al.
Page 8
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Scheme 3.
Key: (i) ref 11, (R)-propylene oxide, 92%, 94:6 dr; (ii) TESCl, Et3N, DMAP, CH2Cl2; (iii)
LDA, BH3·NH3, THF, 0 °C, 78% over two steps; (iv) TPAP, NMO, CH2Cl2, 85%.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
J Org Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 17.
Zhang et al.
Page 9
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Scheme 4.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Key: (i) TiCl4 (1 equiv), (−)-sparteine (2.5 equiv), 21, CH2Cl2, 0.15 M, −78 °C, 40 min, 1.25:1
dr (23:24), 44% 23, 30% 24; (ii) TiCl4 (1 equiv), (−)-sparteine (2.5 equiv), 2-butenal,
CH2Cl2, 0.15 M, −78 °C, 40 min, 80%.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
J Org Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 17.
Zhang et al.
Page 10
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Scheme 5.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Key: (i) TiCl4 (1 equiv), (−)-sparteine (1 equiv), 21, CH2Cl2, 0.15 M, −78 °C, 40 min, 4:1 dr
(28:29), 53% 28; (ii) Bu2BOTf (1 equiv), Et3N (1.1 equiv), PhMe, 0.15 M, −50 to −30 °C, 2
h, 72%.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
J Org Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 17.
Zhang et al.
Page 11
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Scheme 6.
Key: (i) LiBH4, MeOH, THF, 0 °C to rt; (ii) TBDPSCl, imid, DMAP, CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt; (iii)
(R)/(S) Mosher acid chloride, DMAP, CH2Cl2; (iv) difference in ppm [(S)-Mosher ester–(R)Mosher ester, CDCl3, 400 MHz NMR] shown on structure 35; (v) TPAP, CH2Cl2, molecular
sieves.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
J Org Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 17.
Zhang et al.
Page 12
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Scheme 7.
Possible Explanation for Observed Stereochemical Outcome
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
J Org Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 17.
Zhang et al.
Page 13
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Scheme 8.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Key: (i) TESOTf, 2,6-lutidine, CH2Cl2, 0 °C; (ii) EtSH, KH (cat.), THF; (iii) Me2CuLi, Et2O,
−50 °C; (iv) TESOTf, 2,6-lutidine, CH2Cl2, 0 °C.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
J Org Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 June 17.